Chad vs Suriname: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre

Chad
541.01 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
939.01 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
182nd
Suriname rank
179th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chad
  • Suriname
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 939.01 current US$ per square kilometre against 541.01 current US$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 398 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.7 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Chad ranks 182nd and Suriname ranks 179th of 195 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 15.47 current US$ per square kilometre 19.97 current US$ per square kilometre 4.5 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 13.75 current US$ per square kilometre 323.19 current US$ per square kilometre 309.44 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 18.52 current US$ per square kilometre 605.14 current US$ per square kilometre 586.63 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 43.82 current US$ per square kilometre 348.64 current US$ per square kilometre 304.81 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 105.24 current US$ per square kilometre 1,100 current US$ per square kilometre 994.58 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 292.5 current US$ per square kilometre 1,786 current US$ per square kilometre 1,494 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 460.14 current US$ per square kilometre 639.94 current US$ per square kilometre 179.8 current US$ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre, Chad or Suriname?
Suriname, at 939.01 current US$ per square kilometre against 541.01 current US$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre between Chad and Suriname?
398 current US$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Suriname rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre?
Chad ranks 182nd and Suriname ranks 179th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Suriname: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/suriname/">Chad vs Suriname: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,863 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.