Chad vs Mauritania: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre

Chad
541.01 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
713.51 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
182nd
Mauritania rank
181st

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chad
  • Mauritania
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 713.51 current US$ per square kilometre against 541.01 current US$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 172.5 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.3 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 182nd and Mauritania ranks 181st of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 15.47 current US$ per square kilometre 12.11 current US$ per square kilometre 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 13.75 current US$ per square kilometre 37.56 current US$ per square kilometre 23.81 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 18.52 current US$ per square kilometre 80.5 current US$ per square kilometre 61.98 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 43.82 current US$ per square kilometre 112.39 current US$ per square kilometre 68.57 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 105.24 current US$ per square kilometre 169.97 current US$ per square kilometre 64.73 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 292.5 current US$ per square kilometre 530.27 current US$ per square kilometre 237.76 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 460.14 current US$ per square kilometre 626.99 current US$ per square kilometre 166.85 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre, Chad or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 713.51 current US$ per square kilometre against 541.01 current US$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre between Chad and Mauritania?
172.5 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Mauritania rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre?
Chad ranks 182nd and Mauritania ranks 181st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Mauritania: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/mauritania/">Chad vs Mauritania: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,863 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.