Brazil vs Colombia: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
33,173 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia
32,220 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
103rd
Colombia rank
106th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Colombia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 33,173 current US$ per square kilometre against 32,220 current US$ per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 953 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Colombia ahead.

Brazil ranks 103rd and Colombia ranks 106th of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 5 and Colombia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Colombia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 100.12 current US$ per square kilometre 100.12 current US$ per square kilometre Colombia
1970s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 282.41 current US$ per square kilometre 282.41 current US$ per square kilometre Colombia
1980s 2,529 current US$ per square kilometre 974.71 current US$ per square kilometre 1,554 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 8,787 current US$ per square kilometre 5,160 current US$ per square kilometre 3,627 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 17,258 current US$ per square kilometre 11,611 current US$ per square kilometre 5,647 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 37,227 current US$ per square kilometre 26,879 current US$ per square kilometre 10,348 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 29,158 current US$ per square kilometre 28,193 current US$ per square kilometre 965.05 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Colombia?
Brazil, at 33,173 current US$ per square kilometre against 32,220 current US$ per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Colombia?
953 current US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Colombia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Colombia rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 103rd and Colombia ranks 106th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Colombia: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/colombia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/colombia/">Brazil vs Colombia: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,863 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.