Barbados vs Korea: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre

Barbados
1.77 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Korea
1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
15th
Korea rank
18th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Korea
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 1.77 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre in Korea, a difference of 423,390 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times Korea's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 15th and Korea ranks 18th of 195 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Korea Difference Ahead
1970s 134,272 current US$ per square kilometre 45,279 current US$ per square kilometre 88,993 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 344,877 current US$ per square kilometre 125,037 current US$ per square kilometre 219,840 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 699,768 current US$ per square kilometre 418,538 current US$ per square kilometre 281,230 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 1.26 million current US$ per square kilometre 818,719 current US$ per square kilometre 443,819 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 1.31 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.26 million current US$ per square kilometre 47,423 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 1.53 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.48 million current US$ per square kilometre 49,902 current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre, Barbados or Korea?
Barbados, at 1.77 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.35 million current US$ per square kilometre in Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre between Barbados and Korea?
423,390 current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Korea?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Korea rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current us$), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 15th and Korea ranks 18th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Korea: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/korea-rep/">Barbados vs Korea: Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,863 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.