Romania vs Switzerland: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant

Romania
0.442 Percentage of GDP
in 2023
Switzerland
0.427 Percentage of GDP
in 2023
Romania rank
24th
Switzerland rank
25th

Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant over time

  • Romania
  • Switzerland
0.20.40.60.8200120122023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.442 Percentage of GDP against 0.427 Percentage of GDP in Switzerland, a difference of 0.015 Percentage of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Switzerland ahead.

Romania ranks 24th and Switzerland ranks 25th of 31 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 0.2453 Percentage of GDP 0.5326 Percentage of GDP 0.2872 Percentage of GDP Switzerland
2010s 0.5009 Percentage of GDP 0.4787 Percentage of GDP 0.0222 Percentage of GDP Romania
2020s 0.3945 Percentage of GDP 0.44 Percentage of GDP 0.0455 Percentage of GDP Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher subnational government climate finance — climate significant, Romania or Switzerland?
Romania, at 0.442 Percentage of GDP against 0.427 Percentage of GDP in Switzerland as of 2023.
What is the difference in subnational government climate finance — climate significant between Romania and Switzerland?
0.015 Percentage of GDP, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Switzerland?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Romania and Switzerland rank globally for subnational government climate finance — climate significant?
Romania ranks 24th and Switzerland ranks 25th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant investment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Switzerland: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/subnational-government-climate-finance-climate-significant-investment/romania/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/subnational-government-climate-finance-climate-significant-investment/romania/switzerland/">Romania vs Switzerland: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant investment
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
32 places, 716 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

The Subnational Government Climate Finance database provides comparable data on subnational public climate-significant expenditure and investment, covering the years from 2001 to 2023, for 33 OECD and EU countries. This database was built using a pioneer methodology developed in the framework of the project “Financing Climate Action in Regions and Cities”, a joint 2022 project between the OECD and the European Commission Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG REGIO). The methodology relies on a refined approach to the COFOG classification from the System of National Accounts. Using the EU taxonomy for sustainability activities, three first-level COFOG functions (economic affairs and housing and community amenities) and 13 second-level COFOG functions (e.g. transport and energy, environmental protection, waste, water management, housing development) were identified as being “climate-significant”, meaning that expenditure and investment in these areas contributes, to some extent, to climate adaptation or mitigation objectives. For more information on the methodology used and related work on climate finance tracking, please visit: Tracking subnational government climate expenditure