Lithuania vs Netherlands: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant

Lithuania
0.494 Percentage of GDP
in 2023
Netherlands
0.472 Percentage of GDP
in 2023
Lithuania rank
22nd
Netherlands rank
23rd

Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant over time

  • Lithuania
  • Netherlands
0.250.50.7511.2200120122023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.494 Percentage of GDP against 0.472 Percentage of GDP in Netherlands, a difference of 0.022 Percentage of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Netherlands ahead.

Lithuania ranks 22nd and Netherlands ranks 23rd of 31 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 0.6529 Percentage of GDP 0.7648 Percentage of GDP 0.1119 Percentage of GDP Netherlands
2010s 0.6355 Percentage of GDP 0.6404 Percentage of GDP 0.0049 Percentage of GDP Netherlands
2020s 0.396 Percentage of GDP 0.4555 Percentage of GDP 0.0595 Percentage of GDP Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher subnational government climate finance — climate significant, Lithuania or Netherlands?
Lithuania, at 0.494 Percentage of GDP against 0.472 Percentage of GDP in Netherlands as of 2023.
What is the difference in subnational government climate finance — climate significant between Lithuania and Netherlands?
0.022 Percentage of GDP, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Netherlands?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Netherlands rank globally for subnational government climate finance — climate significant?
Lithuania ranks 22nd and Netherlands ranks 23rd of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant investment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Netherlands: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/subnational-government-climate-finance-climate-significant-investment/lithuania/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/subnational-government-climate-finance-climate-significant-investment/lithuania/netherlands/">Lithuania vs Netherlands: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant investment
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
32 places, 716 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

The Subnational Government Climate Finance database provides comparable data on subnational public climate-significant expenditure and investment, covering the years from 2001 to 2023, for 33 OECD and EU countries. This database was built using a pioneer methodology developed in the framework of the project “Financing Climate Action in Regions and Cities”, a joint 2022 project between the OECD and the European Commission Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG REGIO). The methodology relies on a refined approach to the COFOG classification from the System of National Accounts. Using the EU taxonomy for sustainability activities, three first-level COFOG functions (economic affairs and housing and community amenities) and 13 second-level COFOG functions (e.g. transport and energy, environmental protection, waste, water management, housing development) were identified as being “climate-significant”, meaning that expenditure and investment in these areas contributes, to some extent, to climate adaptation or mitigation objectives. For more information on the methodology used and related work on climate finance tracking, please visit: Tracking subnational government climate expenditure