Italy vs Japan: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant
Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant over time
- Italy
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.893 Percentage of GDP against 0.87 Percentage of GDP in Italy, a difference of 0.023 Percentage of GDP.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 10th and Japan ranks 8th of 31 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.635 Percentage of GDP | 0.8504 Percentage of GDP | 0.2154 Percentage of GDP | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.5088 Percentage of GDP | 0.8337 Percentage of GDP | 0.3249 Percentage of GDP | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.7855 Percentage of GDP | 0.9763 Percentage of GDP | 0.1907 Percentage of GDP | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher subnational government climate finance — climate significant, Italy or Japan?
- Japan, at 0.893 Percentage of GDP against 0.87 Percentage of GDP in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in subnational government climate finance — climate significant between Italy and Japan?
- 0.023 Percentage of GDP, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Japan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Japan rank globally for subnational government climate finance — climate significant?
- Italy ranks 10th and Japan ranks 8th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant investment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Subnational Government Climate Finance database provides comparable data on subnational public climate-significant expenditure and investment, covering the years from 2001 to 2023, for 33 OECD and EU countries. This database was built using a pioneer methodology developed in the framework of the project “Financing Climate Action in Regions and Cities”, a joint 2022 project between the OECD and the European Commission Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG REGIO). The methodology relies on a refined approach to the COFOG classification from the System of National Accounts. Using the EU taxonomy for sustainability activities, three first-level COFOG functions (economic affairs and housing and community amenities) and 13 second-level COFOG functions (e.g. transport and energy, environmental protection, waste, water management, housing development) were identified as being “climate-significant”, meaning that expenditure and investment in these areas contributes, to some extent, to climate adaptation or mitigation objectives. For more information on the methodology used and related work on climate finance tracking, please visit: Tracking subnational government climate expenditure