Bulgaria vs Poland: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant

Bulgaria
0.694 Percentage of GDP
in 2023
Poland
0.796 Percentage of GDP
in 2023
Bulgaria rank
15th
Poland rank
13th

Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Poland
0.20.40.60.8200120122023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 0.796 Percentage of GDP against 0.694 Percentage of GDP in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.102 Percentage of GDP.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Bulgaria's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Bulgaria ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 15th and Poland ranks 13th of 31 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4989 Percentage of GDP 0.4942 Percentage of GDP 0.0047 Percentage of GDP Bulgaria
2010s 0.4633 Percentage of GDP 0.5235 Percentage of GDP 0.0602 Percentage of GDP Poland
2020s 0.4908 Percentage of GDP 0.6288 Percentage of GDP 0.138 Percentage of GDP Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher subnational government climate finance — climate significant, Bulgaria or Poland?
Poland, at 0.796 Percentage of GDP against 0.694 Percentage of GDP in Bulgaria as of 2023.
What is the difference in subnational government climate finance — climate significant between Bulgaria and Poland?
0.102 Percentage of GDP, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Poland?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Bulgaria and Poland rank globally for subnational government climate finance — climate significant?
Bulgaria ranks 15th and Poland ranks 13th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant investment. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Poland: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/subnational-government-climate-finance-climate-significant-investment/bulgaria/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/subnational-government-climate-finance-climate-significant-investment/bulgaria/poland/">Bulgaria vs Poland: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant investment
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
32 places, 716 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

The Subnational Government Climate Finance database provides comparable data on subnational public climate-significant expenditure and investment, covering the years from 2001 to 2023, for 33 OECD and EU countries. This database was built using a pioneer methodology developed in the framework of the project “Financing Climate Action in Regions and Cities”, a joint 2022 project between the OECD and the European Commission Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG REGIO). The methodology relies on a refined approach to the COFOG classification from the System of National Accounts. Using the EU taxonomy for sustainability activities, three first-level COFOG functions (economic affairs and housing and community amenities) and 13 second-level COFOG functions (e.g. transport and energy, environmental protection, waste, water management, housing development) were identified as being “climate-significant”, meaning that expenditure and investment in these areas contributes, to some extent, to climate adaptation or mitigation objectives. For more information on the methodology used and related work on climate finance tracking, please visit: Tracking subnational government climate expenditure