Slovak Republic vs Slovenia: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant

Slovak Republic
2.99 Percentage of GDP
in 2023
Slovenia
3.29 Percentage of GDP
in 2023
Slovak Republic rank
1st
Slovenia rank
3rd

Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant over time

  • Slovak Republic
  • Slovenia
1234200120122023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 3.29 Percentage of GDP against 2.99 Percentage of GDP in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.3 Percentage of GDP.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Slovak Republic's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Slovak Republic ahead.

Slovak Republic ranks 1st and Slovenia ranks 3rd of 1 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Slovak Republic averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovak Republic Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 2.42 Percentage of GDP 1.21 Percentage of GDP 1.2 Percentage of GDP Slovak Republic
2010s 2.21 Percentage of GDP 2.45 Percentage of GDP 0.2355 Percentage of GDP Slovenia
2020s 2.15 Percentage of GDP 2.8 Percentage of GDP 0.6583 Percentage of GDP Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher subnational government climate finance — climate significant, Slovak Republic or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 3.29 Percentage of GDP against 2.99 Percentage of GDP in Slovak Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in subnational government climate finance — climate significant between Slovak Republic and Slovenia?
0.3 Percentage of GDP, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovak Republic and Slovenia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Slovak Republic and Slovenia rank globally for subnational government climate finance — climate significant?
Slovak Republic ranks 1st and Slovenia ranks 3rd of 1 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant expenditure. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovak Republic vs Slovenia: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/subnational-government-climate-finance-climate-significant-expenditure/slovak-republic-2/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/subnational-government-climate-finance-climate-significant-expenditure/slovak-republic-2/slovenia/">Slovak Republic vs Slovenia: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant expenditure
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
33 places, 731 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

The Subnational Government Climate Finance database provides comparable data on subnational public climate-significant expenditure and investment, covering the years from 2001 to 2023, for 33 OECD and EU countries. This database was built using a pioneer methodology developed in the framework of the project “Financing Climate Action in Regions and Cities”, a joint 2022 project between the OECD and the European Commission Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG REGIO). The methodology relies on a refined approach to the COFOG classification from the System of National Accounts. Using the EU taxonomy for sustainability activities, three first-level COFOG functions (economic affairs and housing and community amenities) and 13 second-level COFOG functions (e.g. transport and energy, environmental protection, waste, water management, housing development) were identified as being “climate-significant”, meaning that expenditure and investment in these areas contributes, to some extent, to climate adaptation or mitigation objectives. For more information on the methodology used and related work on climate finance tracking, please visit: Tracking subnational government climate expenditure