Luxembourg vs Slovak Republic: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant

Luxembourg
3.27 Percentage of GDP
in 2023
Slovak Republic
2.99 Percentage of GDP
in 2023
Luxembourg rank
4th
Slovak Republic rank
1st

Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Slovak Republic
0123200120122023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 3.27 Percentage of GDP against 2.99 Percentage of GDP in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.28 Percentage of GDP.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Slovak Republic's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Slovak Republic ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 4th and Slovak Republic ranks 1st of 31 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Slovak Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 2.42 Percentage of GDP 2.42 Percentage of GDP 0.0018 Percentage of GDP Luxembourg
2010s 2.58 Percentage of GDP 2.21 Percentage of GDP 0.3705 Percentage of GDP Luxembourg
2020s 3.04 Percentage of GDP 2.15 Percentage of GDP 0.8988 Percentage of GDP Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher subnational government climate finance — climate significant, Luxembourg or Slovak Republic?
Luxembourg, at 3.27 Percentage of GDP against 2.99 Percentage of GDP in Slovak Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in subnational government climate finance — climate significant between Luxembourg and Slovak Republic?
0.28 Percentage of GDP, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Slovak Republic?
19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Luxembourg and Slovak Republic rank globally for subnational government climate finance — climate significant?
Luxembourg ranks 4th and Slovak Republic ranks 1st of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant expenditure. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Slovak Republic: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/subnational-government-climate-finance-climate-significant-expenditure/luxembourg/slovak-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/subnational-government-climate-finance-climate-significant-expenditure/luxembourg/slovak-republic-2/">Luxembourg vs Slovak Republic: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant expenditure
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
33 places, 731 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

The Subnational Government Climate Finance database provides comparable data on subnational public climate-significant expenditure and investment, covering the years from 2001 to 2023, for 33 OECD and EU countries. This database was built using a pioneer methodology developed in the framework of the project “Financing Climate Action in Regions and Cities”, a joint 2022 project between the OECD and the European Commission Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG REGIO). The methodology relies on a refined approach to the COFOG classification from the System of National Accounts. Using the EU taxonomy for sustainability activities, three first-level COFOG functions (economic affairs and housing and community amenities) and 13 second-level COFOG functions (e.g. transport and energy, environmental protection, waste, water management, housing development) were identified as being “climate-significant”, meaning that expenditure and investment in these areas contributes, to some extent, to climate adaptation or mitigation objectives. For more information on the methodology used and related work on climate finance tracking, please visit: Tracking subnational government climate expenditure