Iceland vs Lithuania: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant

Iceland
1.03 Percentage of GDP
in 2023
Lithuania
1.5 Percentage of GDP
in 2023
Iceland rank
30th
Lithuania rank
28th

Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant over time

  • Iceland
  • Lithuania
00.511.52200120122023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 1.5 Percentage of GDP against 1.03 Percentage of GDP in Iceland, a difference of 0.47 Percentage of GDP.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.5 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 30th and Lithuania ranks 28th of 31 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 0.8474 Percentage of GDP 1.16 Percentage of GDP 0.3161 Percentage of GDP Lithuania
2010s 0.7943 Percentage of GDP 1.36 Percentage of GDP 0.5619 Percentage of GDP Lithuania
2020s 1.02 Percentage of GDP 1.4 Percentage of GDP 0.3838 Percentage of GDP Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher subnational government climate finance — climate significant, Iceland or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 1.5 Percentage of GDP against 1.03 Percentage of GDP in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in subnational government climate finance — climate significant between Iceland and Lithuania?
0.47 Percentage of GDP, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Lithuania?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Lithuania rank globally for subnational government climate finance — climate significant?
Iceland ranks 30th and Lithuania ranks 28th of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant expenditure. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Lithuania: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/subnational-government-climate-finance-climate-significant-expenditure/iceland/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/subnational-government-climate-finance-climate-significant-expenditure/iceland/lithuania/">Iceland vs Lithuania: Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Subnational government climate finance — Climate significant expenditure
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
33 places, 731 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

The Subnational Government Climate Finance database provides comparable data on subnational public climate-significant expenditure and investment, covering the years from 2001 to 2023, for 33 OECD and EU countries. This database was built using a pioneer methodology developed in the framework of the project “Financing Climate Action in Regions and Cities”, a joint 2022 project between the OECD and the European Commission Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG REGIO). The methodology relies on a refined approach to the COFOG classification from the System of National Accounts. Using the EU taxonomy for sustainability activities, three first-level COFOG functions (economic affairs and housing and community amenities) and 13 second-level COFOG functions (e.g. transport and energy, environmental protection, waste, water management, housing development) were identified as being “climate-significant”, meaning that expenditure and investment in these areas contributes, to some extent, to climate adaptation or mitigation objectives. For more information on the methodology used and related work on climate finance tracking, please visit: Tracking subnational government climate expenditure