Poland vs Uzbekistan: Secondary income receipts
Secondary income receipts over time
- Poland
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Poland currently reports 15.39 billion BoP, current US$ against 15.14 billion BoP, current US$ in Uzbekistan, a difference of 251.90 million BoP, current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 28th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 198 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.20 billion BoP, current US$ | 1.29 billion BoP, current US$ | 6.91 billion BoP, current US$ | Poland |
| 2010s | 9.92 billion BoP, current US$ | 4.30 billion BoP, current US$ | 5.62 billion BoP, current US$ | Poland |
| 2020s | 12.41 billion BoP, current US$ | 10.07 billion BoP, current US$ | 2.34 billion BoP, current US$ | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher secondary income receipts, Poland or Uzbekistan?
- Poland, at 15.39 billion BoP, current US$ against 15.14 billion BoP, current US$ in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in secondary income receipts between Poland and Uzbekistan?
- 251.90 million BoP, current US$, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Uzbekistan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Poland and Uzbekistan rank globally for secondary income receipts?
- Poland ranks 28th and Uzbekistan ranks 30th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Secondary income refers to transfers recorded in the balance of payments whenever an economy provides or receives goods, services, income, or financial items without a quid pro quo. All transfers not considered to be capital are current. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.