Malawi vs New Caledonia: Secondary income receipts
Secondary income receipts over time
- Malawi
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 649.02 million BoP, current US$ against 642.35 million BoP, current US$ in New Caledonia, a difference of 6.67 million BoP, current US$.
Across all 15 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 130th and New Caledonia ranks 132nd of 198 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 296.24 million BoP, current US$ | 717.84 million BoP, current US$ | 421.60 million BoP, current US$ | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 509.27 million BoP, current US$ | 810.67 million BoP, current US$ | 301.40 million BoP, current US$ | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher secondary income receipts, Malawi or New Caledonia?
- Malawi, at 649.02 million BoP, current US$ against 642.35 million BoP, current US$ in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in secondary income receipts between Malawi and New Caledonia?
- 6.67 million BoP, current US$, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and New Caledonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Malawi and New Caledonia rank globally for secondary income receipts?
- Malawi ranks 130th and New Caledonia ranks 132nd of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Secondary income refers to transfers recorded in the balance of payments whenever an economy provides or receives goods, services, income, or financial items without a quid pro quo. All transfers not considered to be capital are current. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.