Lebanon vs Sweden: Secondary income receipts
Secondary income receipts over time
- Lebanon
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 7.96 billion BoP, current US$ against 7.91 billion BoP, current US$ in Lebanon, a difference of 54.54 million BoP, current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sweden ahead.
Lebanon ranks 51st and Sweden ranks 50th of 198 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.92 billion BoP, current US$ | 3.74 billion BoP, current US$ | 1.18 billion BoP, current US$ | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 8.37 billion BoP, current US$ | 5.92 billion BoP, current US$ | 2.45 billion BoP, current US$ | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 7.74 billion BoP, current US$ | 6.99 billion BoP, current US$ | 751.17 million BoP, current US$ | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher secondary income receipts, Lebanon or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 7.96 billion BoP, current US$ against 7.91 billion BoP, current US$ in Lebanon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in secondary income receipts between Lebanon and Sweden?
- 54.54 million BoP, current US$, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Sweden?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Sweden rank globally for secondary income receipts?
- Lebanon ranks 51st and Sweden ranks 50th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Secondary income refers to transfers recorded in the balance of payments whenever an economy provides or receives goods, services, income, or financial items without a quid pro quo. All transfers not considered to be capital are current. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.