Grenada vs San Marino: Secondary income receipts
Secondary income receipts over time
- Grenada
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 64.69 million BoP, current US$ against 55.31 million BoP, current US$ in Grenada, a difference of 9.38 million BoP, current US$.
That makes San Marino's figure about 1.2 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 183rd and San Marino ranks 181st of 198 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 57.61 million BoP, current US$ | 40.53 million BoP, current US$ | 17.08 million BoP, current US$ | Grenada |
| 2020s | 73.23 million BoP, current US$ | 57.48 million BoP, current US$ | 15.75 million BoP, current US$ | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher secondary income receipts, Grenada or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 64.69 million BoP, current US$ against 55.31 million BoP, current US$ in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in secondary income receipts between Grenada and San Marino?
- 9.38 million BoP, current US$, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and San Marino?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and San Marino rank globally for secondary income receipts?
- Grenada ranks 183rd and San Marino ranks 181st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Secondary income refers to transfers recorded in the balance of payments whenever an economy provides or receives goods, services, income, or financial items without a quid pro quo. All transfers not considered to be capital are current. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.