Estonia vs Iraq: Secondary income receipts
Secondary income receipts over time
- Estonia
- Iraq
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 1.29 billion BoP, current US$ against 1.24 billion BoP, current US$ in Iraq, a difference of 50.01 million BoP, current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iraq ahead.
Estonia ranks 112th and Iraq ranks 113th of 198 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 462.65 million BoP, current US$ | 262.14 million BoP, current US$ | 200.51 million BoP, current US$ | Estonia |
| 2010s | 602.38 million BoP, current US$ | 1.06 billion BoP, current US$ | 457.61 million BoP, current US$ | Iraq |
| 2020s | 883.70 million BoP, current US$ | 1.55 billion BoP, current US$ | 670.10 million BoP, current US$ | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher secondary income receipts, Estonia or Iraq?
- Estonia, at 1.29 billion BoP, current US$ against 1.24 billion BoP, current US$ in Iraq as of 2025.
- What is the difference in secondary income receipts between Estonia and Iraq?
- 50.01 million BoP, current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Iraq?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Iraq rank globally for secondary income receipts?
- Estonia ranks 112th and Iraq ranks 113th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Secondary income refers to transfers recorded in the balance of payments whenever an economy provides or receives goods, services, income, or financial items without a quid pro quo. All transfers not considered to be capital are current. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.