Ecuador vs Lebanon: Secondary income receipts
Secondary income receipts over time
- Ecuador
- Lebanon
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 8.25 billion BoP, current US$ against 7.91 billion BoP, current US$ in Lebanon, a difference of 343.14 million BoP, current US$.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 49th and Lebanon ranks 51st of 198 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.69 billion BoP, current US$ | 4.92 billion BoP, current US$ | 2.23 billion BoP, current US$ | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 3.04 billion BoP, current US$ | 8.37 billion BoP, current US$ | 5.33 billion BoP, current US$ | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 4.96 billion BoP, current US$ | 7.74 billion BoP, current US$ | 2.77 billion BoP, current US$ | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher secondary income receipts, Ecuador or Lebanon?
- Ecuador, at 8.25 billion BoP, current US$ against 7.91 billion BoP, current US$ in Lebanon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in secondary income receipts between Ecuador and Lebanon?
- 343.14 million BoP, current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Lebanon?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Lebanon rank globally for secondary income receipts?
- Ecuador ranks 49th and Lebanon ranks 51st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Secondary income refers to transfers recorded in the balance of payments whenever an economy provides or receives goods, services, income, or financial items without a quid pro quo. All transfers not considered to be capital are current. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.