East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Netherlands: Secondary income receipts

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
136.28 billion BoP, current US$
in 2024
Netherlands
18.13 billion BoP, current US$
in 2024
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
24th
Netherlands rank
23rd

Secondary income receipts over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Netherlands
050.0B100.0B150.0B196719952024

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) currently reports 136.28 billion BoP, current US$ against 18.13 billion BoP, current US$ in Netherlands, a difference of 118.15 billion BoP, current US$.

That makes East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s figure about 7.5 times Netherlands's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 24th and Netherlands ranks 23rd of 47 groups.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 56.23 billion BoP, current US$ 10.26 billion BoP, current US$ 45.97 billion BoP, current US$ East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
2010s 103.56 billion BoP, current US$ 11.57 billion BoP, current US$ 91.99 billion BoP, current US$ East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
2020s 126.00 billion BoP, current US$ 16.39 billion BoP, current US$ 109.61 billion BoP, current US$ East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Netherlands?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), at 136.28 billion BoP, current US$ against 18.13 billion BoP, current US$ in Netherlands as of 2024.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Netherlands?
118.15 billion BoP, current US$, with East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Netherlands?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Netherlands rank globally for secondary income receipts?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 24th and Netherlands ranks 23rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Netherlands: Secondary income receipts. Statizoid, drawing on Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/netherlands/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Netherlands: Secondary income receipts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
246 places, 9,218 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Secondary income refers to transfers recorded in the balance of payments whenever an economy provides or receives goods, services, income, or financial items without a quid pro quo. All transfers not considered to be capital are current. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.