Cayman Islands vs Denmark: Secondary income receipts
Secondary income receipts over time
- Cayman Islands
- Denmark
How they compare
Cayman Islands currently reports 5.80 billion BoP, current US$ against 5.58 billion BoP, current US$ in Denmark, a difference of 219.88 million BoP, current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Denmark ahead.
Cayman Islands ranks 58th and Denmark ranks 59th of 198 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.46 billion BoP, current US$ | 3.83 billion BoP, current US$ | 2.37 billion BoP, current US$ | Denmark |
| 2020s | 4.39 billion BoP, current US$ | 5.13 billion BoP, current US$ | 740.35 million BoP, current US$ | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher secondary income receipts, Cayman Islands or Denmark?
- Cayman Islands, at 5.80 billion BoP, current US$ against 5.58 billion BoP, current US$ in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in secondary income receipts between Cayman Islands and Denmark?
- 219.88 million BoP, current US$, with Cayman Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Denmark?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Cayman Islands and Denmark rank globally for secondary income receipts?
- Cayman Islands ranks 58th and Denmark ranks 59th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Secondary income refers to transfers recorded in the balance of payments whenever an economy provides or receives goods, services, income, or financial items without a quid pro quo. All transfers not considered to be capital are current. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.