Brazil vs Serbia: Secondary income receipts
Secondary income receipts over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 8.63 billion BoP, current US$ against 8.45 billion BoP, current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 179.40 million BoP, current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 46th of 198 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.01 billion BoP, current US$ | 4.54 billion BoP, current US$ | 466.26 million BoP, current US$ | Brazil |
| 2010s | 5.11 billion BoP, current US$ | 4.67 billion BoP, current US$ | 438.01 million BoP, current US$ | Brazil |
| 2020s | 9.93 billion BoP, current US$ | 7.02 billion BoP, current US$ | 2.91 billion BoP, current US$ | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher secondary income receipts, Brazil or Serbia?
- Brazil, at 8.63 billion BoP, current US$ against 8.45 billion BoP, current US$ in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in secondary income receipts between Brazil and Serbia?
- 179.40 million BoP, current US$, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for secondary income receipts?
- Brazil ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 46th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Secondary income refers to transfers recorded in the balance of payments whenever an economy provides or receives goods, services, income, or financial items without a quid pro quo. All transfers not considered to be capital are current. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.