Algeria vs Latvia: Secondary income receipts
Secondary income receipts over time
- Algeria
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 2.50 billion BoP, current US$ against 2.45 billion BoP, current US$ in Algeria, a difference of 48.76 million BoP, current US$.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Algeria has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 88th of 198 countries.
Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.59 billion BoP, current US$ | 1.64 billion BoP, current US$ | 951.16 million BoP, current US$ | Algeria |
| 2010s | 3.40 billion BoP, current US$ | 1.24 billion BoP, current US$ | 2.16 billion BoP, current US$ | Algeria |
| 2020s | 2.47 billion BoP, current US$ | 1.63 billion BoP, current US$ | 837.87 million BoP, current US$ | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher secondary income receipts, Algeria or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 2.50 billion BoP, current US$ against 2.45 billion BoP, current US$ in Algeria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in secondary income receipts between Algeria and Latvia?
- 48.76 million BoP, current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Latvia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Algeria and Latvia rank globally for secondary income receipts?
- Algeria ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 88th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Secondary income refers to transfers recorded in the balance of payments whenever an economy provides or receives goods, services, income, or financial items without a quid pro quo. All transfers not considered to be capital are current. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.