Mongolia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Prevalence of unaffordability (PUA) — Value — July 2026
Prevalence of unaffordability (PUA) — Value — July 2026 over time
- Mongolia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 32 % against 29.8 % in Mongolia, a difference of 2.2 %.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 73rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 71st of 159 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 48.87 % | 28.3 % | 20.57 % | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 37.48 % | 32.77 % | 4.72 % | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of unaffordability (pua) — value — july 2026, Mongolia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 32 % against 29.8 % in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in prevalence of unaffordability (pua) — value — july 2026 between Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 2.2 %, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for prevalence of unaffordability (pua) — value — july 2026?
- Mongolia ranks 73rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 71st of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of unaffordability (PUA) — Value — July 2026 (SOFI report). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicators on the cost and affordability of a healthy diet (CoAHD) are estimated in each country and show the population’s physical and economic access to least expensive locally available foods to meet requirements for a healthy diet, as defined in food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs). The indicators use observed retail food consumer prices and income distributions to provide an operational measure of people’s access to locally available foods in the proportions needed for health. These indicators support efforts within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030 (SDG 2). They also support the monitoring of progress towards the objective of transforming agrifood systems by promoting “nutrition-sensitive agriculture”. FAO, in partnership with the Food Price for Nutrition of the World Bank, produces and reports the CoAHD indicators.