Equatorial Guinea vs Syrian Arab Republic: Prevalence of unaffordability (PUA) — Value — July 2026
Prevalence of unaffordability (PUA) — Value — July 2026 over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 63.2 % against 61.1 % in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 2.1 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 56.9 % | 47.5 % | 9.4 % | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 61.35 % | 70.82 % | 9.47 % | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of unaffordability (pua) — value — july 2026, Equatorial Guinea or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 63.2 % against 61.1 % in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in prevalence of unaffordability (pua) — value — july 2026 between Equatorial Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 2.1 %, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for prevalence of unaffordability (pua) — value — july 2026?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 29th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of unaffordability (PUA) — Value — July 2026 (SOFI report). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicators on the cost and affordability of a healthy diet (CoAHD) are estimated in each country and show the population’s physical and economic access to least expensive locally available foods to meet requirements for a healthy diet, as defined in food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs). The indicators use observed retail food consumer prices and income distributions to provide an operational measure of people’s access to locally available foods in the proportions needed for health. These indicators support efforts within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030 (SDG 2). They also support the monitoring of progress towards the objective of transforming agrifood systems by promoting “nutrition-sensitive agriculture”. FAO, in partnership with the Food Price for Nutrition of the World Bank, produces and reports the CoAHD indicators.