Eastern Asia vs Equatorial Guinea: Prevalence of unaffordability (PUA) — Value — July 2026
Prevalence of unaffordability (PUA) — Value — July 2026 over time
- Eastern Asia
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 63.2 % against 11.2 % in Eastern Asia, a difference of 52 %.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 5.6 times Eastern Asia's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia ranks 24th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th of 33 groups.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.03 % | 56.9 % | 32.87 % | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 15.6 % | 61.35 % | 45.75 % | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of unaffordability (pua) — value — july 2026, Eastern Asia or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 63.2 % against 11.2 % in Eastern Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in prevalence of unaffordability (pua) — value — july 2026 between Eastern Asia and Equatorial Guinea?
- 52 %, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Equatorial Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Eastern Asia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for prevalence of unaffordability (pua) — value — july 2026?
- Eastern Asia ranks 24th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of unaffordability (PUA) — Value — July 2026 (SOFI report). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicators on the cost and affordability of a healthy diet (CoAHD) are estimated in each country and show the population’s physical and economic access to least expensive locally available foods to meet requirements for a healthy diet, as defined in food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs). The indicators use observed retail food consumer prices and income distributions to provide an operational measure of people’s access to locally available foods in the proportions needed for health. These indicators support efforts within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030 (SDG 2). They also support the monitoring of progress towards the objective of transforming agrifood systems by promoting “nutrition-sensitive agriculture”. FAO, in partnership with the Food Price for Nutrition of the World Bank, produces and reports the CoAHD indicators.