Papua New Guinea vs Uganda: Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply
Papua New Guinea
-1.7%
in 2023
Uganda
-0.7%
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
50th
Uganda rank
48th
Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports -0.7% against -1.7% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 50th and Uganda ranks 48th of 192 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9% | -0.3% | 1.2% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | -1.0% | -1.4% | 0.4% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply, Papua New Guinea or Uganda?
- Uganda, at -0.7% against -1.7% in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply between Papua New Guinea and Uganda?
- 1.0%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Uganda?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Uganda rank globally for net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 50th and Uganda ranks 48th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net exported tonnes of food products expressed as a share of domestic supply. This includes items primarily intended for human consumption, but some may also be used for non-food purposes such as biofuels or animal feed. Positive values mean that countries are net exporters and negative values mean they are net importers.