Latvia vs Uruguay: Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply
Latvia
41.2%
in 2023
Uruguay
44.6%
in 2023
Latvia rank
12th
Uruguay rank
11th
Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply over time
- Latvia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 44.6% against 41.2% in Latvia, a difference of 3.4%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
Latvia ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 11th of 192 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -3.2% | 36.4% | 39.6% | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 3.7% | 60.2% | 56.5% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 27.3% | 83.6% | 56.2% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 54.9% | 63.0% | 8.1% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply, Latvia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 44.6% against 41.2% in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply between Latvia and Uruguay?
- 3.4%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Uruguay rank globally for net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply?
- Latvia ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 11th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net exported tonnes of food products expressed as a share of domestic supply. This includes items primarily intended for human consumption, but some may also be used for non-food purposes such as biofuels or animal feed. Positive values mean that countries are net exporters and negative values mean they are net importers.