Kiribati vs Lithuania: Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply
Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply over time
- Kiribati
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 44.9% against 35.3% in Kiribati, a difference of 9.6%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.3 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 13th and Lithuania ranks 10th of 192 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.7% | 6.0% | 41.7% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 6.2% | 12.0% | 5.7% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 28.2% | 36.8% | 8.6% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 36.2% | 44.5% | 8.3% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply, Kiribati or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 44.9% against 35.3% in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply between Kiribati and Lithuania?
- 9.6%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Lithuania rank globally for net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply?
- Kiribati ranks 13th and Lithuania ranks 10th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net exported tonnes of food products expressed as a share of domestic supply. This includes items primarily intended for human consumption, but some may also be used for non-food purposes such as biofuels or animal feed. Positive values mean that countries are net exporters and negative values mean they are net importers.