Kiribati vs Latvia: Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply
Kiribati
35.3%
in 2023
Latvia
41.2%
in 2023
Kiribati rank
13th
Latvia rank
12th
Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply over time
- Kiribati
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 41.2% against 35.3% in Kiribati, a difference of 5.9%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 13th and Latvia ranks 12th of 192 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.7% | -3.2% | 50.9% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 6.2% | 3.7% | 2.5% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 28.2% | 27.3% | 0.8% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 36.2% | 54.9% | 18.7% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply, Kiribati or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 41.2% against 35.3% in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply between Kiribati and Latvia?
- 5.9%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Latvia rank globally for net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply?
- Kiribati ranks 13th and Latvia ranks 12th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net exported tonnes of food products expressed as a share of domestic supply. This includes items primarily intended for human consumption, but some may also be used for non-food purposes such as biofuels or animal feed. Positive values mean that countries are net exporters and negative values mean they are net importers.