Ecuador vs Estonia: Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply
Ecuador
26.0%
in 2023
Estonia
25.4%
in 2023
Ecuador rank
17th
Estonia rank
18th
Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply over time
- Ecuador
- Estonia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 26.0% against 25.4% in Estonia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 17th and Estonia ranks 18th of 192 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.5% | -1.5% | 25.0% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 30.4% | -4.9% | 35.3% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 23.8% | 17.1% | 6.7% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 27.1% | 29.4% | 2.2% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply, Ecuador or Estonia?
- Ecuador, at 26.0% against 25.4% in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply between Ecuador and Estonia?
- 0.6%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Estonia rank globally for net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply?
- Ecuador ranks 17th and Estonia ranks 18th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net exported tonnes of food products expressed as a share of domestic supply. This includes items primarily intended for human consumption, but some may also be used for non-food purposes such as biofuels or animal feed. Positive values mean that countries are net exporters and negative values mean they are net importers.