Angola vs Uzbekistan: Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply
Angola
-7.4%
in 2023
Uzbekistan
-8.0%
in 2023
Angola rank
69th
Uzbekistan rank
71st
Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply over time
- Angola
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Angola currently reports -7.4% against -8.0% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 69th and Uzbekistan ranks 71st of 192 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -15.0% | -13.9% | 1.1% | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | -13.6% | -3.5% | 10.1% | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | -14.1% | -7.2% | 7.0% | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | -9.8% | -7.5% | 2.2% | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply, Angola or Uzbekistan?
- Angola, at -7.4% against -8.0% in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply between Angola and Uzbekistan?
- 0.6%, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Uzbekistan rank globally for net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply?
- Angola ranks 69th and Uzbekistan ranks 71st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net exported tonnes of food products expressed as a share of domestic supply. This includes items primarily intended for human consumption, but some may also be used for non-food purposes such as biofuels or animal feed. Positive values mean that countries are net exporters and negative values mean they are net importers.