Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer

Equatorial Guinea
93.37
in 2025
Namibia
92.3
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
114th
Namibia rank
115th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Namibia
406080100120199120082025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 93.37 against 92.3 in Namibia, a difference of 1.07.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 114th and Namibia ranks 115th of 124 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 89.89 46.01 43.88 Equatorial Guinea
2000s 68.64 83.93 15.29 Namibia
2010s 102.39 113 10.61 Namibia
2020s 92.77 104.19 11.43 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — producer, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 93.37 against 92.3 in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — producer between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
1.07, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — producer?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 114th and Namibia ranks 115th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer Price Index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-biological-producer-price-index-2014-2016-100/equatorial-guinea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-biological-producer-price-index-2014-2016-100/equatorial-guinea/namibia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer Price Index (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
133 places, 4,412 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

This sub-domain contains data on agriculture producer prices and the producer price index. Agriculture producer prices are prices received by farmers for primary crops, live animals and livestock primary products as collected at the point of initial sale (prices paid at the farm gate). Annual data are provided from 1991 (while mothly data start in January 2010) for 180 countries and 212 products. The producer price index is the index of agricultural producer prices that measures the average annual change over time in the selling prices received by farmers (prices at the farm gate or at the first point of sale). The three categories of producer price index available in FAOSTAT comprise: single-item price index, commodity group index and the agriculture producer price index.