China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer

China, Hong Kong SAR
81.07
in 2025
Namibia
92.3
in 2025
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
118th
Namibia rank
115th

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Namibia
50100150200199120082025

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 92.3 against 81.07 in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 11.23.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 118th and Namibia ranks 115th of 124 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 56.08 46.01 10.07 China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 51.02 83.93 32.92 Namibia
2010s 93.34 113 19.67 Namibia
2020s 110.22 104.19 6.02 China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — producer, China, Hong Kong SAR or Namibia?
Namibia, at 92.3 against 81.07 in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2025.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — producer between China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia?
11.23, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — producer?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 118th and Namibia ranks 115th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer Price Index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-biological-producer-price-index-2014-2016-100/china-hong-kong-sar/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-biological-producer-price-index-2014-2016-100/china-hong-kong-sar/namibia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (biological) — Producer Price Index (2014-2016 = 100)
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
133 places, 4,412 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

This sub-domain contains data on agriculture producer prices and the producer price index. Agriculture producer prices are prices received by farmers for primary crops, live animals and livestock primary products as collected at the point of initial sale (prices paid at the farm gate). Annual data are provided from 1991 (while mothly data start in January 2010) for 180 countries and 212 products. The producer price index is the index of agricultural producer prices that measures the average annual change over time in the selling prices received by farmers (prices at the farm gate or at the first point of sale). The three categories of producer price index available in FAOSTAT comprise: single-item price index, commodity group index and the agriculture producer price index.