Malaysia vs New Zealand: Implied tax subsidy rates on R&D expenditures

Malaysia
0.2 Index
in 2025
New Zealand
0.18 Index
in 2025
Malaysia rank
11th
New Zealand rank
13th

Implied tax subsidy rates on R&D expenditures over time

  • Malaysia
  • New Zealand
00.10.2200020122025

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.2 Index against 0.18 Index in New Zealand, a difference of 0.02 Index.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 11th and New Zealand ranks 13th of 44 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 0.234 Index 0.001 Index 0.233 Index Malaysia
2010s 0.206 Index 0.004 Index 0.202 Index Malaysia
2020s 0.2 Index 0.18 Index 0.02 Index Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher implied tax subsidy rates on r&d expenditures, Malaysia or New Zealand?
Malaysia, at 0.2 Index against 0.18 Index in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in implied tax subsidy rates on r&d expenditures between Malaysia and New Zealand?
0.02 Index, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and New Zealand?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Malaysia and New Zealand rank globally for implied tax subsidy rates on r&d expenditures?
Malaysia ranks 11th and New Zealand ranks 13th of 44 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Implied tax subsidy rates on R&D expenditures. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs New Zealand: Implied tax subsidy rates on R&D expenditures. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/implied-tax-subsidy-rates-on-r-and-d-expenditures/malaysia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/implied-tax-subsidy-rates-on-r-and-d-expenditures/malaysia/new-zealand/">Malaysia vs New Zealand: Implied tax subsidy rates on R&D expenditures</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Implied tax subsidy rates on R&D expenditures
Unit
Index
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
58 places, 1,462 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

The OECD R&D Tax Incentives database presents OECD time-series indicators of implied tax subsidy rates on R&D expenditures by firm size and profitability scenario for OECD member countries and other major economies, drawing on data collected in the OECD R&D tax incentives surveys since 2007. Implied R&D tax subsidy rates are defined as 1 minus the B-Index, a measure of the before-tax income needed by a “representative” firm to break even on one additional monetary unit of R&D outlay (Warda, 2001; OECD, 2023). The more generous the tax provisions for R&D, the lower the before-tax breakeven economic return required by firms and the higher the implied marginal R&D tax subsidy. The OECD time-series estimates of implied R&D tax subsidy rates is based on headline tax credit and allowance rates. Due to limited historical data availability, the estimates are not adjusted for provisions that bound the tax benefits received by firms (e.g. ceilings, thresholds). They therefore provide an upper bound for the marginal tax subsidy implied by R&D tax relief measures at central government level across countries over time. OECD (2019) provides a practical guide to using the OECD R&D Tax Incentives database, describing the R&D tax incentive time series data and highlighting their potential for internationally comparative work through descriptive indicators and econometric analysis.