Dominica vs Sao Tome and Principe: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre

Dominica
20,558 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
20,689 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
54th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
53rd

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre over time

  • Dominica
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 20,689 units per square kilometre against 20,558 units per square kilometre in Dominica, a difference of 131 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Dominica ranks 54th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 53rd of 189 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 5 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre —
1970s 667.45 units per square kilometre 639.14 units per square kilometre 28.31 units per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 16,350 units per square kilometre 4,197 units per square kilometre 12,153 units per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 11,275 units per square kilometre 7,916 units per square kilometre 3,358 units per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 19,192 units per square kilometre 11,244 units per square kilometre 7,948 units per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 19,043 units per square kilometre 15,477 units per square kilometre 3,567 units per square kilometre Dominica
2020s 21,116 units per square kilometre 21,251 units per square kilometre 134.88 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre, Dominica or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 20,689 units per square kilometre against 20,558 units per square kilometre in Dominica as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre between Dominica and Sao Tome and Principe?
131 units per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for imf holdings of currency, us dollar, per square kilometre?
Dominica ranks 54th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 53rd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Sao Tome and Principe: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/dominica/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/imf-holdings-of-currency-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/dominica/sao-tome-and-principe/">Dominica vs Sao Tome and Principe: IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,792 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IMF holdings of currency, US dollar divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.