Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure … unit GDP PPP

Low & middle income
1.42 current international $ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
2.47 current international $ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Low & middle income rank
19th
Rwanda rank
20th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure … unit GDP PPP over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Rwanda
00.511.522.5199020072025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 2.47 current international $ per US$ of GDP against 1.42 current international $ per US$ of GDP in Low & middle income, a difference of 1.05 current international $ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.7 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Low & middle income ahead.

Low & middle income ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 20th of 43 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 1.36 current international $ per US$ of GDP 1.63 current international $ per US$ of GDP 0.2648 current international $ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 1.39 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.01 current international $ per US$ of GDP 0.6201 current international $ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 1.07 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.03 current international $ per US$ of GDP 0.9594 current international $ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 1.29 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.24 current international $ per US$ of GDP 0.9443 current international $ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Low & middle income or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 2.47 current international $ per US$ of GDP against 1.42 current international $ per US$ of GDP in Low & middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Low & middle income and Rwanda?
1.05 current international $ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Rwanda?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Low & middle income and Rwanda rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Low & middle income ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 20th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-unit-of/low-and-middle-income/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-unit-of/low-and-middle-income/rwanda/">Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP
Unit
current international $ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
225 places, 6,835 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.