Sweden vs Tunisia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Sweden
806,772 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
822,078 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden rank
88th
Tunisia rank
87th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Sweden
  • Tunisia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199020062023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 822,078 current international $ per square kilometre against 806,772 current international $ per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 15,306 current international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 88th and Tunisia ranks 87th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 232,943 current international $ per square kilometre 127,472 current international $ per square kilometre 105,471 current international $ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 361,755 current international $ per square kilometre 267,066 current international $ per square kilometre 94,689 current international $ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 523,155 current international $ per square kilometre 543,093 current international $ per square kilometre 19,938 current international $ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 705,896 current international $ per square kilometre 745,826 current international $ per square kilometre 39,930 current international $ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Sweden or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 822,078 current international $ per square kilometre against 806,772 current international $ per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Sweden and Tunisia?
15,306 current international $ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tunisia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Sweden and Tunisia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Sweden ranks 88th and Tunisia ranks 87th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Tunisia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/sweden/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/sweden/tunisia/">Sweden vs Tunisia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.