New Zealand vs Norway: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

New Zealand
614,333 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
617,844 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
99th
Norway rank
98th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • New Zealand
  • Norway
200.0k400.0k600.0k199020062023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 617,844 current international $ per square kilometre against 614,333 current international $ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 3,511 current international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 99th and Norway ranks 98th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 138,070 current international $ per square kilometre 134,063 current international $ per square kilometre 4,007 current international $ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 221,361 current international $ per square kilometre 236,946 current international $ per square kilometre 15,585 current international $ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 350,361 current international $ per square kilometre 385,254 current international $ per square kilometre 34,893 current international $ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 540,378 current international $ per square kilometre 535,809 current international $ per square kilometre 4,570 current international $ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), New Zealand or Norway?
Norway, at 617,844 current international $ per square kilometre against 614,333 current international $ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between New Zealand and Norway?
3,511 current international $ per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Norway?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Norway rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
New Zealand ranks 99th and Norway ranks 98th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Norway: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/new-zealand/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/new-zealand/norway/">New Zealand vs Norway: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.