Moldova vs Panama: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Moldova
961,339 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
1.02 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Moldova rank
81st
Panama rank
78th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Moldova
  • Panama
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M199020062023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 1.02 million current international $ per square kilometre against 961,339 current international $ per square kilometre in Moldova, a difference of 62,151 current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Panama ahead.

Moldova ranks 81st and Panama ranks 78th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 149,572 current international $ per square kilometre 148,958 current international $ per square kilometre 614.2 current international $ per square kilometre Moldova
2000s 315,695 current international $ per square kilometre 276,280 current international $ per square kilometre 39,415 current international $ per square kilometre Moldova
2010s 628,242 current international $ per square kilometre 684,841 current international $ per square kilometre 56,599 current international $ per square kilometre Panama
2020s 916,490 current international $ per square kilometre 900,622 current international $ per square kilometre 15,868 current international $ per square kilometre Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Moldova or Panama?
Panama, at 1.02 million current international $ per square kilometre against 961,339 current international $ per square kilometre in Moldova as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Moldova and Panama?
62,151 current international $ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Panama?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Moldova and Panama rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Moldova ranks 81st and Panama ranks 78th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Moldova vs Panama: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/moldova/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/moldova/panama/">Moldova vs Panama: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.