Iceland vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Iceland
139,613 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
137,078 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
151st
Kazakhstan rank
154th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Iceland
  • Kazakhstan
050.0k100.0k150.0k199020062023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 139,613 current international $ per square kilometre against 137,078 current international $ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2,535 current international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 151st and Kazakhstan ranks 154th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 36,173 current international $ per square kilometre 13,869 current international $ per square kilometre 22,304 current international $ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 57,009 current international $ per square kilometre 26,698 current international $ per square kilometre 30,311 current international $ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 75,532 current international $ per square kilometre 75,073 current international $ per square kilometre 459.18 current international $ per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 118,826 current international $ per square kilometre 119,164 current international $ per square kilometre 337.7 current international $ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Iceland or Kazakhstan?
Iceland, at 139,613 current international $ per square kilometre against 137,078 current international $ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Iceland and Kazakhstan?
2,535 current international $ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kazakhstan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Kazakhstan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Iceland ranks 151st and Kazakhstan ranks 154th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/iceland/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/iceland/kazakhstan/">Iceland vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.