Georgia vs Sweden: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Georgia
759,839 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
806,772 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
89th
Sweden rank
88th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Georgia
  • Sweden
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199020062023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 806,772 current international $ per square kilometre against 759,839 current international $ per square kilometre in Georgia, a difference of 46,933 current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Sweden ahead.

Georgia ranks 89th and Sweden ranks 88th of 179 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 131,868 current international $ per square kilometre 246,925 current international $ per square kilometre 115,057 current international $ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 216,942 current international $ per square kilometre 361,755 current international $ per square kilometre 144,812 current international $ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 423,260 current international $ per square kilometre 523,155 current international $ per square kilometre 99,895 current international $ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 670,505 current international $ per square kilometre 705,896 current international $ per square kilometre 35,390 current international $ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Georgia or Sweden?
Sweden, at 806,772 current international $ per square kilometre against 759,839 current international $ per square kilometre in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Georgia and Sweden?
46,933 current international $ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Sweden?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Sweden rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Georgia ranks 89th and Sweden ranks 88th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Sweden: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/georgia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/georgia/sweden/">Georgia vs Sweden: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.