Gambia vs Latvia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Gambia
747,619 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
692,152 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
91st
Latvia rank
94th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Gambia
  • Latvia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199020062023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 747,619 current international $ per square kilometre against 692,152 current international $ per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 55,467 current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Latvia ahead.

Gambia ranks 91st and Latvia ranks 94th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 71,172 current international $ per square kilometre 138,768 current international $ per square kilometre 67,597 current international $ per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 219,881 current international $ per square kilometre 250,610 current international $ per square kilometre 30,729 current international $ per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 380,103 current international $ per square kilometre 397,260 current international $ per square kilometre 17,157 current international $ per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 645,150 current international $ per square kilometre 590,767 current international $ per square kilometre 54,383 current international $ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Gambia or Latvia?
Gambia, at 747,619 current international $ per square kilometre against 692,152 current international $ per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Gambia and Latvia?
55,467 current international $ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Latvia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Latvia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Gambia ranks 91st and Latvia ranks 94th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Latvia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/gambia-the/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/gambia-the/latvia/">Gambia vs Latvia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.