Gambia vs Georgia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Gambia
747,619 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia
759,839 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
91st
Georgia rank
89th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Gambia
  • Georgia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199020062023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 759,839 current international $ per square kilometre against 747,619 current international $ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 12,220 current international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Georgia ahead.

Gambia ranks 91st and Georgia ranks 89th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 71,172 current international $ per square kilometre 131,868 current international $ per square kilometre 60,697 current international $ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 219,881 current international $ per square kilometre 216,942 current international $ per square kilometre 2,939 current international $ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 380,103 current international $ per square kilometre 423,260 current international $ per square kilometre 43,157 current international $ per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 645,150 current international $ per square kilometre 670,505 current international $ per square kilometre 25,356 current international $ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Gambia or Georgia?
Georgia, at 759,839 current international $ per square kilometre against 747,619 current international $ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Gambia and Georgia?
12,220 current international $ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Georgia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Georgia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Gambia ranks 91st and Georgia ranks 89th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Georgia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/gambia-the/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/gambia-the/georgia/">Gambia vs Georgia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.