Estonia vs Gambia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Estonia
748,696 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
747,619 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
90th
Gambia rank
91st

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Estonia
  • Gambia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199020062023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 748,696 current international $ per square kilometre against 747,619 current international $ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 1,077 current international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 90th and Gambia ranks 91st of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Gambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Gambia Difference Ahead
1990s 118,290 current international $ per square kilometre 69,565 current international $ per square kilometre 48,725 current international $ per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 249,145 current international $ per square kilometre 219,881 current international $ per square kilometre 29,264 current international $ per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 422,645 current international $ per square kilometre 380,103 current international $ per square kilometre 42,542 current international $ per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 640,937 current international $ per square kilometre 645,150 current international $ per square kilometre 4,213 current international $ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Estonia or Gambia?
Estonia, at 748,696 current international $ per square kilometre against 747,619 current international $ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Estonia and Gambia?
1,077 current international $ per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Gambia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Gambia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Estonia ranks 90th and Gambia ranks 91st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Gambia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/estonia/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/estonia/gambia-the/">Estonia vs Gambia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.