Equatorial Guinea vs Fiji: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Equatorial Guinea
523,462 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Fiji
513,033 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
104th
Fiji rank
105th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Fiji
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k199020062023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 523,462 current international $ per square kilometre against 513,033 current international $ per square kilometre in Fiji, a difference of 10,429 current international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Fiji ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 104th and Fiji ranks 105th of 179 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Fiji in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Fiji Difference Ahead
2000s 146,337 current international $ per square kilometre 246,638 current international $ per square kilometre 100,301 current international $ per square kilometre Fiji
2010s 330,774 current international $ per square kilometre 325,682 current international $ per square kilometre 5,092 current international $ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 470,626 current international $ per square kilometre 437,201 current international $ per square kilometre 33,426 current international $ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Equatorial Guinea or Fiji?
Equatorial Guinea, at 523,462 current international $ per square kilometre against 513,033 current international $ per square kilometre in Fiji as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Equatorial Guinea and Fiji?
10,429 current international $ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Fiji?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Fiji rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 104th and Fiji ranks 105th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Fiji: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/equatorial-guinea/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/equatorial-guinea/fiji/">Equatorial Guinea vs Fiji: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.