China vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

China
1.50 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
1.52 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
63rd
Pakistan rank
61st

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • China
  • Pakistan
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199020062023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 1.52 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.50 million current international $ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 26,770 current international $ per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

China ranks 63rd and Pakistan ranks 61st of 179 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 75,646 current international $ per square kilometre 266,222 current international $ per square kilometre 190,576 current international $ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 235,422 current international $ per square kilometre 572,837 current international $ per square kilometre 337,415 current international $ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 721,546 current international $ per square kilometre 1.01 million current international $ per square kilometre 288,134 current international $ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 1.26 million current international $ per square kilometre 1.44 million current international $ per square kilometre 183,508 current international $ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), China or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 1.52 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.50 million current international $ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between China and Pakistan?
26,770 current international $ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Pakistan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Pakistan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
China ranks 63rd and Pakistan ranks 61st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/china/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/china/pakistan/">China vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.