China vs Croatia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

China
1.50 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia
1.66 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
63rd
Croatia rank
60th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • China
  • Croatia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199020062023

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 1.66 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.50 million current international $ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 163,520 current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times China's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.

China ranks 63rd and Croatia ranks 60th of 179 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 97,612 current international $ per square kilometre 410,763 current international $ per square kilometre 313,152 current international $ per square kilometre Croatia
2000s 235,422 current international $ per square kilometre 652,533 current international $ per square kilometre 417,111 current international $ per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 721,546 current international $ per square kilometre 925,523 current international $ per square kilometre 203,978 current international $ per square kilometre Croatia
2020s 1.26 million current international $ per square kilometre 1.36 million current international $ per square kilometre 102,915 current international $ per square kilometre Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), China or Croatia?
Croatia, at 1.66 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.50 million current international $ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between China and Croatia?
163,520 current international $ per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Croatia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do China and Croatia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
China ranks 63rd and Croatia ranks 60th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Croatia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/china/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/china/croatia/">China vs Croatia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.