Chad vs Mauritania: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Chad
23,561 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
16,655 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
172nd
Mauritania rank
175th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Chad
  • Mauritania
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k199020062023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 23,561 current international $ per square kilometre against 16,655 current international $ per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 6,906 current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.4 times Mauritania's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 172nd and Mauritania ranks 175th of 179 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s 3,201 current international $ per square kilometre 2,049 current international $ per square kilometre 1,152 current international $ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 8,242 current international $ per square kilometre 4,176 current international $ per square kilometre 4,066 current international $ per square kilometre Chad
2010s 16,164 current international $ per square kilometre 9,011 current international $ per square kilometre 7,152 current international $ per square kilometre Chad
2020s 22,214 current international $ per square kilometre 14,855 current international $ per square kilometre 7,359 current international $ per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Chad or Mauritania?
Chad, at 23,561 current international $ per square kilometre against 16,655 current international $ per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Chad and Mauritania?
6,906 current international $ per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mauritania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Chad and Mauritania rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Chad ranks 172nd and Mauritania ranks 175th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Mauritania: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/chad/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/chad/mauritania/">Chad vs Mauritania: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.