Central African Republic vs Suriname: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Central African Republic
9,067 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
16,118 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2010
Central African Republic rank
179th
Suriname rank
176th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Suriname
05.0k10.0k15.0k199020062023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 16,118 current international $ per square kilometre against 9,067 current international $ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 7,051 current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.8 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 179th and Suriname ranks 176th of 179 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 4,830 current international $ per square kilometre 14,152 current international $ per square kilometre 9,322 current international $ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 5,171 current international $ per square kilometre 16,118 current international $ per square kilometre 10,947 current international $ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Central African Republic or Suriname?
Suriname, at 16,118 current international $ per square kilometre against 9,067 current international $ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2010.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Central African Republic and Suriname?
7,051 current international $ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Suriname?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
How do Central African Republic and Suriname rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Central African Republic ranks 179th and Suriname ranks 176th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Suriname: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/central-african-republic/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/central-african-republic/suriname/">Central African Republic vs Suriname: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.