Cambodia vs Cote d'Ivoire: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Cambodia
394,087 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire
463,858 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
117th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
114th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Cambodia
  • Cote d'Ivoire
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k199020062023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 463,858 current international $ per square kilometre against 394,087 current international $ per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 69,771 current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Cote d'Ivoire's figure about 1.2 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cambodia ranks 117th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 114th of 179 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Cote d'Ivoire in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Cote d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
1990s 44,678 current international $ per square kilometre 71,947 current international $ per square kilometre 27,269 current international $ per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2010s 315,198 current international $ per square kilometre 268,738 current international $ per square kilometre 46,461 current international $ per square kilometre Cambodia
2020s 356,375 current international $ per square kilometre 386,852 current international $ per square kilometre 30,477 current international $ per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Cambodia or Cote d'Ivoire?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 463,858 current international $ per square kilometre against 394,087 current international $ per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Cambodia and Cote d'Ivoire?
69,771 current international $ per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Cote d'Ivoire?
11 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Cambodia ranks 117th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 114th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Cote d'Ivoire: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/cambodia/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/cambodia/cote-d-ivoire/">Cambodia vs Cote d'Ivoire: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.