Botswana vs Mali: Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP

Botswana
37,156 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali
47,192 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
168th
Mali rank
165th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption … square kilometre PPP over time

  • Botswana
  • Mali
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199020062023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 47,192 current international $ per square kilometre against 37,156 current international $ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 10,036 current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.3 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 168th and Mali ranks 165th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mali Difference Ahead
1990s 5,031 current international $ per square kilometre 4,753 current international $ per square kilometre 277.93 current international $ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 10,737 current international $ per square kilometre 10,773 current international $ per square kilometre 35.42 current international $ per square kilometre Mali
2010s 21,949 current international $ per square kilometre 25,969 current international $ per square kilometre 4,020 current international $ per square kilometre Mali
2020s 32,879 current international $ per square kilometre 42,061 current international $ per square kilometre 9,182 current international $ per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current), Botswana or Mali?
Mali, at 47,192 current international $ per square kilometre against 37,156 current international $ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current) between Botswana and Mali?
10,036 current international $ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mali?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Mali rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure, ppp (current)?
Botswana ranks 168th and Mali ranks 165th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Mali: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/botswana/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-ppp-current-international-per-square/botswana/mali/">Botswana vs Mali: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 6,374 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.